Saryu Roy Alleges Rs 10,000 Crore Missing From Jharkhand Treasury

Jamshedpur West MLA Seeks Probe Into Alleged Financial Irregularities

Key Points:

• Saryu Roy questions Rs 10,000 crore treasury shortfall
• Former finance minister’s audit reportedly flagged discrepancies
• Demand raised for inquiry under Hemant Soren government

JAMSHEDPUR – Jamshedpur West MLA Saryu Roy alleged that Rs 10,000 crore is unaccounted for in Jharkhand’s treasury.

The allegation was made by Saryu Roy, MLA from Jamshedpur West. He accused the state government of serious financial lapses.

However, Roy said the missing amount remains untraced. He questioned the government’s financial accountability.

Meanwhile, he referred to an audit ordered earlier. The audit was conducted during Rameshwar Oraon’s tenure.

Moreover, Roy claimed the audit exposed irregularities. He said the findings raised serious concerns.

In contrast, he stated departmental secretaries were questioned. However, answers reportedly remained unclear.

Meanwhile, Roy alleged that meetings were convened. Senior officials were asked about missing funds.

However, he claimed the current finance minister called another meeting. The concerned secretary allegedly skipped attendance.

Moreover, Roy questioned administrative seriousness. He said such absence raised further doubts.

In addition, Roy demanded a full investigation. He urged the present government to act.

Meanwhile, he specifically named Hemant Soren and the finance minister. He demanded accountability from both.

However, Roy said the alleged amount involves public money. He stressed the need for transparency.

In contrast, he questioned why findings remain unresolved. He said delays weaken public trust.

Meanwhile, Roy reiterated that Rs 10,000 crore is substantial. He said clarity is essential.

Moreover, he addressed the issue publicly in Jamshedpur. The statement drew political attention.

However, similar allegations were raised earlier by Roy. These include previous scam claims.

Meanwhile, Roy has frequently criticised the state government. One instance was earlier public remarks.

Moreover, he earlier questioned governance claims. This was reported during anniversary statements.

In contrast, Roy also leads legislative reviews. He chaired assembly committee meetings earlier.

Meanwhile, the state government has not issued a response. Further developments are awaited.