Bombay HC quashes FIR against father, clarifying criteria under IPC Section 361.
In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court clarified the scope of IPC Section 361 concerning the kidnapping of minors.
Mumbai – The Bombay High Court recently ruled that a father cannot be deemed guilty of kidnapping if he takes his minor child away from the mother, unless there exists an order from a competent court barring him from the child’s custody.
The judgment was passed by a division bench comprising Justice Vinay Joshi and Justice Valmiki SA Menezes in Nagpur. The court was considering an FIR lodged by the child’s mother, accusing the father of forcibly taking their 3-year-old son.
The court elucidated that unless the father’s guardianship rights have been stripped away by an official court order, he cannot be charged under Section 361 of the IPC. This section outlines the parameters for ‘kidnapping from lawful guardianship’.
Advocates Pavan Dahat and AB Moon, representing the father, contended that as the natural guardian, the father’s actions did not fit the definition of kidnapping as per Section 361.
The Explanation to Section 361 terms “lawful guardian” as an individual with the legal duty of caring for the minor. The court emphasized that to commit the offence, the individual taking the minor shouldn’t be a “lawful guardian”.
The judgment cited that under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, the father is recognized as the primary guardian, followed by the mother. It was further observed that there was no court order granting the mother exclusive custody.
Concluding the matter, the court affirmed that the father, while taking his child from the mother, is merely transferring custody from one lawful guardian to another. Deeming the ongoing prosecution as a misuse of the judicial process, the court quashed the FIR, stating no evidence of kidnapping was presented.
